Home›Robotic Lunar Exploration Missions›Crewed›NoBrowse ByNoFactsNoSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)FactsComparisonField Origin EraWell-attested1959 1NoFilter Results25 entriesProgram FamilyAllChandrayaan Lunar Missions (4)Chang'e Lunar Missions (8)Commercial Lunar Lander Missions (3)Early American and Soviet Robotic Lunar Programs (3)Lunar Missions of Japan, Europe and Korea (4)NASA Post-Apollo Robotic Lunar Missions (3)Mission TypeAllFlyby Mission (1)Lander / Rover (9)Orbiter (10)Robotic / Uncrewed Mission (7)Rover Mission (5)Sample-Return Mission (2)Launch EraAll1959-01-02 (1)1966-05-30 (1)2003-09-27 (1)2007-09-14 (1)2007-10-24 (3)2008-10-22 (2)2009-06-18 (1)2010-10-01 (1)2013-09-07 (1)2013-12-01 (1)2018-12-07 (1)2019-02-22 (1)2019-07-22 (1)2020-11-23 (1)2022-06-28 (1)2022-08-04 (1)2022-12-11 (1)2023-07-14 (1)2023-09-06 (1)2024-02-15 (1)2024-05-03 (1)Operating AgencyAllChina National Space Administration (8)European Space Agency (1)Intuitive Machines (1)ispace (Japanese company) (1)Israel Aerospace Industries (1)ISRO (4)JAXA (2)Korea Aerospace Research Institute (1)NASA (4)Soviet space program (2)SpaceIL (1)TargetAllMoon (23)OutcomeAllFailure (2)Partial (3)Success (11)Part OfAllChandrayaan Programme (3)Chang'e Program (6)Show ResultsBrowseCompareSelect all 25Beresheet MissionNoCAPSTONE MissionNoChandrayaan ProgrammeNoChandrayaan-1NoChandrayaan-2NoChandrayaan-3NoChang'e 1NoChang'e 2NoChang'e 3NoChang'e 4NoChang'e 5NoChang'e 6NoChang'e ProgramNoChinese Lunar Exploration ProgramNoDanuri MissionNoHakuto-R Lunar Landing MissionNoIM-1 MissionNoLADEE MissionNoLCROSS MissionNoLuna ProgramNoSELENE MissionNoSLIM MissionNoSMART-1 MissionNoSurveyor ProgramNoZond ProgramNoSources1. Wikipedia: Luna programmetier 2Wikimedia FoundationLuna programme, lead sectionQuote, Luna programme, lead sectionThe Luna programme, sometimes called Lunik by western media, was a series of robotic spacecraft missions sent to the Moon by the Soviet Union between 1959 and 1976.View the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.