Space and Astronomy Atlas

How The Universe Works
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Concept

Reusable Launch Vehicle

Orbital Mechanics and Spaceflight Engineering

A reusable launch vehicle has parts that can be recovered and reflown while carrying payloads from the surface to outer space. The cited article says rocket stages are the most common parts aimed for reuse, that smaller parts such as fairings, boosters or rocket engines can also be reused, and that reusable spacecraft may be launched on top of an expendable launch vehicle. Reusing parts means they do not need to be made for each launch, reducing launch cost significantly, although the benefit can be diminished by the cost of recovery and refurbishment, and reusable vehicles may carry additional avionics and propellant that make them heavier than expendable counterparts. Launch vehicles of this class are grouped under this concept.

Connections

Vehicle Class Of

Source Falcon Heavy (Wikipedia)
Source Space Shuttle (program)
Sources
Reusable Launch Vehicle
  • Wikipedia, lead section
    A reusable launch vehicle has parts that can be recovered and reflown, while carrying payloads from the surface to outer space.
  • In Group: Launch System Classes, Lead sentence
    A reusable launch vehicle has parts that can be recovered and reflown, while carrying payloads from the surface to outer space.
View the Source
Space Shuttle (program)
Vehicle Class Of: Space Shuttle, Lead sentence
Quote, Vehicle Class Of: Space Shuttle, Lead sentence
The Space Shuttle is a retired, partially reusable low Earth orbital spacecraft system operated from 1981 to 2011 by the U.S.
View the Source
Falcon Heavy (Wikipedia)
Vehicle Class Of: Falcon Heavy, Lead sentence
Quote, Vehicle Class Of: Falcon Heavy, Lead sentence
Falcon Heavy is a super heavy-lift launch vehicle with partial reusability that can carry cargo into Earth orbit and beyond.
View the Source

Take a Related Quiz

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.